beyond a reasonable doubt (2024)

Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial. In other words, the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant’s guilt in order to render a guilty verdict. This standard of proof is much higher than the civil standard, called “preponderance of the evidence,” which only requires a certainty greater than 50 percent.

Related Terms:

Further Reading:

For an article detailing the origins of this standard, download this University of Chicago Law Review article.

For Supreme Court cases related to this legal standard, see Patterson v. New York and Mullaney v. Wilbur.

[Last updated in May of 2020 by the Wex Definitions Team]

beyond a reasonable doubt (2024)

FAQs

What does beyond a reasonable doubt mean? ›

This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial. In other words, the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt in order to render a guilty verdict.

What is reasonable doubt in simple terms? ›

A reasonable doubt exists when a factfinder cannot say with moral certainty that a person is guilty or a particular fact exists. It must be more than an imaginary doubt, and it is often defined judicially as such doubt as would cause a reasonable person to hesitate before acting in a matter of importance.

How to use "beyond reasonable doubt" in a sentence? ›

A jury found unanimously that there was proof of her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Their involvement in the crime would be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. It is my firm belief that no jury could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the evidence presented.

Is beyond a reasonable doubt the highest burden? ›

Beyond reasonable doubt

This is the highest standard used as the burden of proof in Anglo-American jurisprudence and typically only applies in juvenile delinquency proceedings, criminal proceedings, and when considering aggravating circumstances in criminal proceedings.

What is an example of reasonable doubt? ›

Another example of reasonable doubt in a DUI case is if the arresting officer failed to follow proper procedure or they didn't have probable cause. If the defense can demonstrate that there were flaws or any form of negligence in the arrest, this may be enough to cast reasonable doubt on the guilt of the accused.

What is another way to say beyond reasonable doubt? ›

What is another word for beyond doubt?
indisputableincontrovertible
validatedinescapable
de factomatter-of-fact
sure-enoughcorroborated
practicalreasonable
197 more rows

What is the opposite of beyond reasonable doubt? ›

Preponderance of the evidence is required in a civil case and is contrasted with "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is the more severe test of evidence required to convict in a criminal trial. No matter what the definition stated in various legal opinions, the meaning is somewhat subjective.

What percentage is beyond a reasonable doubt? ›

Whereas, in a civil trial, a party may prevail with as little as 51 percent probability (a preponderance), those legal authorities who venture to assign a numerical value to “beyond a reasonable doubt” place it in the certainty range of 98 or 99 percent.

Is beyond a reasonable doubt the same as probable cause? ›

This is much less demanding than the evidence needed to convict "beyond a reasonable doubt." It only requires that there be just enough evidence to support law enforcement's suspicion of a crime. Probable cause is used to obtain warrants to search a home, business, vehicle, or another private establishment.

How do you use beyond doubt in a sentence? ›

A referendum showed beyond doubt that voters wanted independence. His ability is beyond any doubt.

Is beyond a reasonable doubt a standard? ›

"Beyond a reasonable doubt" is the highest legal standard. This is the standard the U.S. Constitution requires the government to meet in order to prove a defendant guilty of a crime. (In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 (1970).)

What is beyond a reasonable doubt clear and convincing? ›

“Clear and convincing evidence” is a medium level burden of proof which must be met for certain convictions/judgments. This standard is a more rigorous to meet than preponderance of the evidence standard, but less rigorous standard to meet than proving evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

What is beyond a reasonable doubt in simple terms? ›

The phrase "beyond a reasonable doubt" means that the evidence presented and the arguments put forward by the prosecution establish the defendant's guilt so clearly that they must be accepted as fact by any rational person.

How does beyond a reasonable doubt end? ›

Nicholas is released, his conviction declared a mistrial, and he becomes a media celebrity, while Hunter's convictions are due to be re-examined by the state. Re-watching Nicholas' documentary, Crystal recognizes the prostitute's hands as the hands of the victim in the murder for which Nicholas was convicted.

Can a person be found guilty without evidence? ›

It simply means the state has to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. If there is no evidence, the DA would most likely not even charge the case. However, circumstantial evidence can and has been used to convict a person and there is nothing wrong with that.

What does it mean to be beyond doubt? ›

You say that something is beyond doubt or beyond reasonable doubt when you are certain that it is true and it cannot be contradicted or disproved. [emphasis] A referendum showed beyond doubt that voters wanted independence. His ability is beyond any doubt. See full dictionary entry for doubt.

What are the three burdens of proof? ›

The Bottom Line

Three levels of the burden of proof, "beyond a reasonable doubt," a "preponderance of the evidence," and "clear and convincing" determine the level of evidence required for a claim.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Aron Pacocha

Last Updated:

Views: 6121

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aron Pacocha

Birthday: 1999-08-12

Address: 3808 Moen Corner, Gorczanyport, FL 67364-2074

Phone: +393457723392

Job: Retail Consultant

Hobby: Jewelry making, Cooking, Gaming, Reading, Juggling, Cabaret, Origami

Introduction: My name is Aron Pacocha, I am a happy, tasty, innocent, proud, talented, courageous, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.